Charles E. Perry, child center building projects fading
by Katie Holland
18 months ago | 822 views | 5 5 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The future of projects at Charles E. Perry Elementary School and Sampson Community College may be dimming even more with four out of five county commissioners saying that they may not be in the cards, if funding such translates into a tax increase.

In an interview, interim county manager Rick Moorefield affirmed that a tax increase would be a reality if the board moves forward with the two building projects, one a new elementary school, the other at Child Development Center on the SCC campus.

“Yes, to build both facilities would require a tax increase,” said Moorefield. In fact, he said if the board decided to build just one facility, it would still lead to a tax hike.

Commissioner John Blanton said he cannot foresee how the project can move forward at this point, but he pointed out that there are too many unknowns for a definite answer at this point.

“Too many things are not in order, and we got no money,” Blanton pointed out.

He admitted that if he had to make a decision now, it would be to stick with the board’s current plan for no tax increase.

“I wouldn’t move forward if it means a tax increase, unless there is some source of money ...Why put us in a deeper hole?” Blanton questioned.

But admittedly, he knows residents of his district, where Perry is located, won’t be happy. “They will feel terrible. They will be upset, but you must look at the total picture. We have no new revenue coming in.”

Commissioner Jefferson Strickland, who also represents a portion of the Roseboro area, agrees that if the building of both facilities means a tax increase, then he is not for continuing the projects as the country slides further into a recession.

“It is not the time for a tax increase ... We don’t know how long or deep this recession will be,” Strickland emphasized.

But he is hoping that President Barack Obama’s stimulus package will extend an olive branch of hope to the funding of these projects, particularly the elementary school.

“Charles E. Perry is the number one priority,” Strickland commented.

He said he also knows that in order for the county to be prepared for the stimulus funds, it will require the design phase of Charles E. Perry to continue.

“The project must be 'shovel ready',” established Strickland. Thus, he feels that completing the design phase for the school is necessary if the county is to be prepared for any potential stimulus money.

Chairman Jarvis McLamb remarked that he does not think the county has seen the end of the current economic downtown, and for that reason, he does not think it is in the county’s best interest to continue with the building of Charles E. Perry or the Child Development Center.

“I think we should stop the projects right now if it means a tax increase,” said McLamb.

And while McLamb understands that Lakewood district residents won’t be pleased with that decision, he’s quick to point out that they shouldn’t place the blame on commissioners’ shoulders.

He pointed out that the Sampson County Board of Education was the group that decided to build Union and Midway High schools ahead of the elementary school, even though a study concluded that Perry should be built first. McLamb believes that it should have been built first.

Commissioner Malachi Faison agrees with his colleagues that if the building of both facilities equals a tax increase, then it is not something that he would go along with.

“My decision is based on the economy. I do not have the slightest idea how (the economy) will go, but we are not going to support building a school at this current time. I just don’t see how we can build it,” said Faison.

He, too, feels that there will be hard feelings among residents of the Lakewood community, “but we have to do what is fiscally best for the county.”

The county’s newest commissioner, Billy Lockamy, feels that if the board promised to build Charles E. Perry, it needs to fulfill that promise, even if it translates into a tax increase.

“We promised that school, and we will try our best to build that school,” Lockamy said.

But, he feels that if the project calls for too large a tax increase, then he, too ,would concede that the project may not be feasible at this time.

“If it is one cent (per $100 valuation), then I don’t think there will be a problem, but if it is three cents, it will definitely be a problem,” said Lockamy.

He, like Strickland, is also hoping that the stimulus plan will provide that extra funding needed to make both buildings a reality for Sampson residents.

Katie Holland can be reached at 910-592-8137, ext. 136, or by email at silife@myclintonnc.com.

comments (5)
« NoOneImportant wrote on Monday, Mar 02 at 03:28 PM »
The sad thing is, there won't be a new Charles E. Perry built. But what is interesting, is looking into the past few years about the proposed build.

An outside group was brought in to evaluate all the schools, and Charles E. Perry was at the top of list, being in dire need of replacing.

On two separate occasions the county sought emergency funding from the federal government to get a new Charles E. Perry built. In one case of funding, they had to show where the new school was to be built, and they sent an address and photos of the new site.

The owner of the property was quoted in the Sampson Independent at that time as being surprised by the new school location, as no one had contacted him about it.

In both cases where they received the emergency funds for Charles E. Perry, the money went to other schools, while C.E.P. was bumped further down the list.

I believe money is still owed to the contractor who drew up plans for the new C.E.P.

Now, with the state of the economy, it is doubtful the school will be built at all.

I am not doubting SampsonOldTimer and the issues in the Union district, but when an outside group comes in and lists C.E.P. being dire need of replacement, I wonder why it kept getting pushed back and pushed back.

If am mistaken in any of my information above, I apologize in advance.

« sampsonGIRL wrote on Monday, Mar 02 at 11:07 AM »
C.E. PERRY IS FALLING DOWN AROUND THE CHILDREN AS I TYPE THIS.... THERE IS SO MANY PROBLEMS AT THIS SCHOOL THAT ARE NOT SAFE.. WHERE WILL THESE CHILDREN GO TO SCHOOL AT WHEN THE BUILDING THEY ARE IN FINAILLLY CRUMBLES AND ALL THE OTHER PROBLEMS COME TO A HEAD. WHAT IS IT GOING TO TAKE.... CHILDREN TO GET SICK OR HURT ??? OR MAYBE SOME PRESSURE FROM THE PUBLIC EYE WILL PUT A RUSH ON GETTING THESE KIDS A NEW SCHOOL!!!!
« usecommonsense wrote on Monday, Mar 02 at 10:36 AM »
Thanks old timer! Why didnt they just build another elementary school?
« sampsonoldtimer wrote on Saturday, Feb 28 at 06:06 AM »
Dear Usecommonsense, evidently you are not up on your facts. The reason the new high school was built in the Union district was it was needed as the old school was built in the early 60's. The conversion of the old high school to the middle school is to free up the old middle school to allow for a new school for grades 4 and 5 to relieve the overcrowded school that exists currently at Union Elementary. There are over 1,000 students housed in a building that was not ever intended to have that many students. That is why there was a new school built. Union is the only district that does not have two feeder schools for the middle school. Fortunate the Lakewood district has CE Perry and Salemburg, Hobbton has Hargrove and Hobbton Elementary and of course don't forget the Midway district with three, Clement, Midway Elementary and Plain View. If you are going to cry use common sense then try getting your facts straight first.
« usecommonsense wrote on Friday, Feb 27 at 02:36 PM »
Why did we build a new high school at Union just to use the old one as a middle school (it must have not been in that bad of shape)? Instead of remodeling it right now why not use the money to fix up Charles E Perry enough to last till hey can build a new one?
Report Abuse...

Comment Guidelines:
The Sampson Independent welcomes and accepts online comments on the basis of relevance to stories. However, profanity and unsubstantiated statements serve no purpose in a discussion of issues of concern in the community and are not accepted, will not be posted and are deleted. When addressing issues of public concern, authors are advised to use statements of fact and focus on topics in an intelligent and clear manner. Comments are recommended to be less than 400 words. The Sampson Independent reserves the right to correct or edit comments for clarity as appropriate and now has an approval process in place that requires each comment to be approved before being posted on the website. Comments made after 11 p.m will be posted the following day. Thank you, The Sampson Independent.
WEATHER
Sponsored By:

LOTTERY
Sponsored By:

STOCKS
Sponsored By:

GASOLINE PRICES
Sponsored By:

featured businesses
RECIPES
Sponsored By: