Most R’boro residents think pet ordinance needed
by Katie Holland
12 months ago | 662 views | 7 7 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Barber Kevin Hobbs, creating a new hairstyle for his cousin Laicon Kuyat, is among a group of residents who favor a pet ordinance.
Barber Kevin Hobbs, creating a new hairstyle for his cousin Laicon Kuyat, is among a group of residents who favor a pet ordinance.
slideshow
While opinions may vary on the specifics of a pet ordinance in the town of Roseboro, most residents agree that one is needed to help control the town’s many dogs and cats.

The issue of creating an ordinance was brought up two months ago when a group of residents came forward at a town meeting to express their concerns about dogs wandering the streets, and some citizens even complained of the dogs biting residents.

So in the last couple of months, town clerk Drenda Ammons and attorney Bill Poole have been working on the first draft of an ordinance. Some of the areas Ammons has suggested for the ordinance include mandatory tags and shots and leashes, limiting the number of pets a resident can own and details on who to call if an animal is roaming free on Roseboro streets.

Roseboro business owner Rusty Jackson has personally seen dogs roaming the streets near her downtown business. Knowing this, she is hopeful that the town will follow through with its plans.

“I think they should have a leash law. Dogs roaming wild can be scary, and they can possibly be run over. I’d hate to see that happen,” said Jackson.

Resident Cathy Naylor has not seen any dogs roaming the streets in her area of town, but she is in favor of controlling the pet population by not allowing any more than four pets per household.

“It would be good just for cleanliness,” said Naylor. She also contended that she has had to deal with neighbors with loud barking dogs, and she would be happy if there was a law in place that would limit the amount of noise she has to deal with.

Resident April M., 29, who asked not be identified by last name, said she is in favor of an ordinance, but she does not want the number of animals a person owns to be limited.

“Actually, as long as the owners are taking care of them, I don’t have a problem with them,” she said.

Roseboro barber Kevin Hobbs is taking special interest in what the town decides to do about animals, since he has invested so much time in them. Currently, he is working with a rescue organization in Cumberland County that will help to save animals from being euthanized.

Hobbs has actually seen dogs roaming the streets, and he chose to take some home with him.

“I have picked them up, rehabilitated them and adopted them out to people,” Hobbs remarked.

But knowing that he can’t take every dog or cat home, he stressed that he is in favor of making sure every dog has a leash through this ordinance.

“Dogs should be controlled. It is better to have them under control,” said Hobbs.

His only concern with the ordinance has to do with the number of pets being limited to four animals.

“They will need to be specific about the types of animals and allow for some leeway for some pets,” said Hobbs.

Katie Holland can be reached at 910-592-8137, ext. 136, or by e-mail at silife@myclintonnc.com.
comments (7)
« sickofsomepeople wrote on Wednesday, Sep 09 at 05:13 PM »
It does not take a lot to scare a dog of of your property. I keep my dogs in a fence but not everyone can afford to. I do not go out threaen to kill someones child because they came into my yard. Yes people should take care of there animals and keep them at home, but sometimes they do get out. Try haveing a decent feeling for the animal that does not know it did something wrong.
« robins3226 wrote on Wednesday, Sep 02 at 07:33 PM »
The missing link.....

http://www.clintonnc.com/pages/full_story/push?article-Wreck seriously injures two teens &id=3505472
« lafus_crickamus wrote on Wednesday, Sep 02 at 01:45 PM »
What the hell is up with that picture? A new type of sattelite set up for direct TV?
« lafus_crickamus wrote on Wednesday, Sep 02 at 01:44 PM »
Yep, now I know why the county commissioners want the Sheriff's department to act as dog catchers. I can see it now. A cage strapped to light bar on top of a patrol car. Lights flashing and siren wailing away, while Fido is huddled in a corner at 80 mph. Dog hair flying every where on the road.

You know at first I thought having a deputy act as dog catcher was demeaning to the officer now I don't even care anymore.

G-girl,

Double OO buckshot at center mass of a dog will work everytime. Happy hunting.
« robins3226 wrote on Wednesday, Sep 02 at 10:27 AM »
I'm just curious....how is an ordinance going to help? These people who are irresponsible with their pets surely dont't give a rat's behind about an ordinance. All you are doing now is placing restrictions on the law abiding residents who take responsibility for their own pets anyway. Just shoot the strays and be done with it. It's the most humane thing you can do to put them out of their misery of wandering around in search of food while slowly starving.
« G-Girl wrote on Wednesday, Sep 02 at 10:14 AM »
I am in favor of a new pet ordinance.

I took the advice of "Anonymous" a few weeks ago, and instead of killing the dogs that are in my yard and jumping into my fence, I called animal control. I was nicely and polietly told that animal control could come out and set traps for the stray dogs IF (1) I sign for the traps and accept responsibility for the $500 trap (if something happened to it, I would pay) (2) SOMEONE really needed to check the trap throughout the day, because they've had animals die in the traps. I just as polietly ask Animal Control to forget that I had called. I am a taxpaying citizens and work daily from 8:00 to 5:00, I wouldn't be home to check the trap.

After speaking to Assistant County Manager Susan Holder, she explained Animal Control can pick up animals 4 months or older who don't have tags displayed IF they are on pubilc right of way. Therefore, I am S.O.L. I think I will go back to my original plan...
« JAFS wrote on Wednesday, Sep 02 at 09:38 AM »
What in the heck is THAT? Is Laicon preparing to star in some sci-fi movie?
Report Abuse...

Comment Guidelines:
The Sampson Independent welcomes and accepts online comments on the basis of relevance to stories. However, profanity and unsubstantiated statements serve no purpose in a discussion of issues of concern in the community and are not accepted, will not be posted and are deleted. When addressing issues of public concern, authors are advised to use statements of fact and focus on topics in an intelligent and clear manner. Comments are recommended to be less than 400 words. The Sampson Independent reserves the right to correct or edit comments for clarity as appropriate and now has an approval process in place that requires each comment to be approved before being posted on the website. Comments made after 11 p.m will be posted the following day. Thank you, The Sampson Independent.
WEATHER
Sponsored By:

LOTTERY
Sponsored By:

STOCKS
Sponsored By:

GASOLINE PRICES
Sponsored By:

featured businesses
RECIPES
Sponsored By: