Sheriff’s Office to handle animal control
by Chris Berendt
11 months ago | 699 views | 14 14 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Sampson County commissioner Malachi Faison, right, inquires about animal control issues during a discussion at the board’s meeting Tuesday night. Commissioners approved the transfer of three animal control officer positions to the Sheriff’s Office. Also pictured, commissioner John Blanton.
Sampson County commissioner Malachi Faison, right, inquires about animal control issues during a discussion at the board’s meeting Tuesday night. Commissioners approved the transfer of three animal control officer positions to the Sheriff’s Office. Also pictured, commissioner John Blanton.
slideshow
The Sampson County Department of Animal Control fields upwards of 400 calls each month to pick up animals or respond to concerns of animal welfare, calls that will now be directed to three sheriff’s deputies patrolling in a primary mission to respond to any animal-related occurrence in the county.

The Sampson County Board of Commissioners unanimously approved transferring three animal control officer positions to the Sheriff’s Office Tuesday, a proposal initially made by county staff Aug. 10. The change is effective Oct. 1.

Assistant county manager Susan Holder, who was responsible for both animal control and the county’s shelter, said the move would be a smart one, as current animal control officers have recently completed recent Basic Law Enforcement Training (BLET) to become certified law enforcement officers.

“This is prudent at this time because the deputies can actually perform duties in the field, where they (previously) would have had to call a sheriff’s deputy,” said Holder, who will continue to oversee the shelter. “(With the change) we won’t have to dispatch a sheriff’s deputy. They would automatically be in the loop.”

In anticipation of the three officers’ completion of BLET and the subsequent transfer, monies were budgeted in the new fiscal year for the pay grade changes.

Holder said the estimated salary hike already budgeted — totaling $14,200 — would bump the three positions up from pay grade 61 to pay grade 64, or $28,164, the minimum salary for a sheriff’s deputy.

The Department of Animal Control receives around 350 calls a month to pick up an animal or check its welfare, according to Holder. There are numerous other calls received by the shelter, she noted, but the estimated 350 encompasses calls for service.

“You would be surprised how many drug calls and dog fighting calls that animal officers are needed for,” Holder pointed out.

County attorney Rick Moorefield attested that there will likely be a transition period that comes with the change, but that it would be more proficient in the long run.

“There will be some quirks and some kinks as this gets worked out, certainly as there is in anything new,” he said. “But we feel this will be best for the county.”

With the transfer, animal control enforcement calls will now be received by 911 communications, rather than shelter staff.

Board chairman Jarvis McLamb said he was still unsure of the move, and what would come of it.

“I talked against it last year, but I’m willing to go along with it and try it for a year,” he said. “I’m not sure if this is the right thing to do or not. With the crime rate rising in Sampson County, the sheriff indicated last year that we were real swamped. I’m just wondering if this will put more burden on (them).”

Sheriff’s Capt. Eric Pope, the sole representative from the agency present at Tuesday’s meeting, said the move would be adding to staff and an increase in manpower was always welcome. He declined to speak specifically to the animal control issue, saying he did not want to lead commissioners astray on a subject on which he was not as knowledgeable.

Moorefield said the Sheriff’s Office was recently down nine positions due to worker’s compensation and other issues. “This would make up some of that slack,” he noted.

Sheriff Jimmy Thornton, who was not able to attend the commissioners meeting, told The Independent Wednesday that he believed the board’s action would be a better use of resources.

“It would be more of a benefit,” the sheriff said. “Not only can they deal with animal control issues, but if a call comes out and they’re in the area, they can respond to it too.”

Thornton said the responsibilities of the officers would be primarily to animal issues, but that they could be utilized elsewhere as needed.

“It’s not exclusive to animal issues,” the sheriff remarked. “They would be responsible for public safety issues. I think it would be a better, workable situation and a better utilization of manpower.”

Holder lauded the officers — Tim Bass, Stacie Colbourne and Matthew Smith — with attending BLET courses five days a week, on their own time, to fulfill the law enforcement obligation and be able to provide that needed manpower on both ends. The three graduated in July.

“They are to be applauded for that,” she said.

Thornton stressed that those with animal control problems call 911.
comments (14)
« lovethecountry wrote on Sunday, Sep 13 at 06:25 PM »
As far as the salaries, it states that these three will be bumped up to starting deputy pay. Don't that mean that they don't even make what a deputy starts out at??People also need to look at surrounding counties, alot of their AC Units is under the S.O. I am sure that there is going to be somethings that are going to have to be worked out,just sit back and watch. Oh, and I am sure that if a citizen is needing help, they are not going to care if the deputy is in a truck or a crown vic!!!!!!
« anonymous wrote on Sunday, Sep 13 at 06:17 PM »
« bpstation14 wrote on Saturday, Sep 12 at 03:14 AM »
This is great news, now the animal control officers will have the tools they need to rescue animals from areas where they previously needed to dispatch an officer too.

This will actually work out to be a cost saving measure.

On a side note, laffass, I mean lafus- so nice to see you again. Not.
« SIStrumpet wrote on Friday, Sep 11 at 03:10 PM »
I am still curious where these deputies/ac officers will put the animals? Will they be driving 4x4 trucks with dog boxes or will we have that cage strapped to the top of the crown vic? What happens when they have a rabid animal on top of their car and get dispatched for a police/deputy call? Do they just take the animal in question with them to the call and as Lafus says, with sirens blaring, fur flying and rabid saliva dripping all over the top of the car? What happens if they arrest someone can they legally have a rabid animal on a car with a suspect in the car. Seems like the county is opening themselves up to all kinds of lawsuits. I can't wait to see how this plays out!
« lafus_crickamus wrote on Friday, Sep 11 at 12:22 PM »
Please dispatch the Sampson County Sheriff's Dept./ Animal Control to Roseboro.

Wild cats and rats on the loose.
« itallmakessensenow wrote on Friday, Sep 11 at 09:37 AM »
I for have one have a problem with this. A deputy just finishing BLET like these 3 have will start at the Sheriff's Office at a little over $26,000 a year. Now, why are these 3 brand new officers getting paid over $28,000 a year to start. It's not fair to the employee's that have already been at the Sheriff's Office. You can work at the Sheriff's Office for 4 to 5 years before you make over $28,000 a year. This no doubt, I'm sure will leave a bad taste in alot of the deputies that have been at the Sheriff's Office mouths. It's a wonder anybody will stay there and put up with that!
« G-Girl wrote on Thursday, Sep 10 at 08:11 PM »
I, for one, am happy that the Sheriff's Department is now in control of Animals...I understand the reasoning behind the change. The article states that Susan Holder will still oversee the shelter...who's gonna work at the shelter? Will new employees be hired? If so, how many? Will they be offered health coverage and vacation time? Also, did county money fund the BLET classes for the 3 current workers? I'm just asking...
« anonymous wrote on Thursday, Sep 10 at 07:06 PM »
tax payer,



it seems that you dont realize you were already paying taxes for animal control. the only difference is in stead of the monies being paid for a seperate dept., they will just fall under the sheriffs dept now. the only real change i see is that now instead of having to tie up two tax paid employees to handle one call, it can be done with one. how is this, you might ask. now for any type of cruelty charges or whatever they can charge people under animal laws for, the animal control officer can handle it all instead of having to have a deputy present to serve the warrants and transport. seems like they might actualy be cutting the cost a little on this one.
« TAX PAYER wrote on Thursday, Sep 10 at 06:41 PM »
WOW!!! LET ME SEE 3 OFFICERS AT $28,000 A YEAR TO HANDLE DOG CATCHING, COMES TO $84,000 A YEAR TO HANDLE ANIMAL CONTROL ISSUES!!! WOW DOES THIS SEEM CRAZY TO ANY ONE ELSE !!! TAX DOLLARS HARD AT WORK AGAIN.
« lafus_crickamus wrote on Thursday, Sep 10 at 04:39 PM »
Wait a minute. I know why no one has a problem with it. To complain about it would be considered anti-SCSD in someone's warped mind.
« zookeeper wrote on Thursday, Sep 10 at 03:24 PM »
Good idea lafe --------. I agree, use the Attorney $ 33,000.00 part and hire that need out (see my comments on Moorfield's article.
« lafus_crickamus wrote on Thursday, Sep 10 at 01:28 PM »
Why doesn't the county use the money for moorefield's yearly salary to set up a seperate department for animal control? Better equipment, better training to handle animal related responses, and better funding. If they are averaging 350 calls a month, seems to me they are going to be more busy with that than trying to perform other law enforcement duties. I'm surprise no one else has a problem with this.

Another reason to clean house of these commissioners next election.
« zookeeper wrote on Thursday, Sep 10 at 12:30 PM »
I am so glad that this has been approved. I had writte a comment on the Roseboro limit article about the need of dart guns for the A C Officers. This will be so much better because 911 can be called 24/7 whereas the Shelter closes at the end of the day. But I do intend to voice my opinion to Sheriff Thornton that the A C Officers who are now allowed to "carry" guns also need dart guns to do this job. This may work on some humans too, ok - ok -ok I know that is wrong they can be tazed.
« Cyber_Bully wrote on Thursday, Sep 10 at 11:40 AM »
Wheeee doggie! Here comes the K9 n'HEAT team!
Report Abuse...

Comment Guidelines:
The Sampson Independent welcomes and accepts online comments on the basis of relevance to stories. However, profanity and unsubstantiated statements serve no purpose in a discussion of issues of concern in the community and are not accepted, will not be posted and are deleted. When addressing issues of public concern, authors are advised to use statements of fact and focus on topics in an intelligent and clear manner. Comments are recommended to be less than 400 words. The Sampson Independent reserves the right to correct or edit comments for clarity as appropriate and now has an approval process in place that requires each comment to be approved before being posted on the website. Comments made after 11 p.m will be posted the following day. Thank you, The Sampson Independent.
WEATHER
Sponsored By:

LOTTERY
Sponsored By:

STOCKS
Sponsored By:

GASOLINE PRICES
Sponsored By:

featured businesses
RECIPES
Sponsored By: