Fatcow Icon
Budget worries could cost county a department, jobs
2 years ago | 1257 views | 15 15 comments | 11 11 recommendations | email to a friend | print
By Katie Holland

Staff Writer

As the Sampson County Board of Commissioners contemplates how to create a budget with no tax increase, some county leaders have actually started looking at cutting positions and possibly dropping a department altogether.

To prove how drastic things have become with the county budget, county manager Rick Moorefield introduced the concept of shutting down a department to save the county funds.

“It might be a way to go,” said Moorefield.

Listening to this concept, chairman Jarvis McLamb asked what the county would save if it were to cut down the recreation department.

Clack responded that it would save the county about $890,000 and the salaries of 12 employees.

In an interview following the meeting, McLamb expressed that the recreation department was a name that he just mentioned as an “example”.

“We don’t know what we will do. We are just putting ideas out in the air,” said McLamb.

County finance officer David Clack also presented a couple of options that the board could consider in its attempt to hold the line on taxes.

However, before he presented them, Clack expressed that certain departments will have some requests that will bring the total deficit expected to be increased from the $400,000 that he reported last week to an approximate $1.2 million. Some of the things that the board was asked to consider include the Sheriff’s Department’s request to purchase another 12 vehicles at the cost of $85,672. In addition, Sampson Community College is seeking an additional $240,200 for capital outlay expenses, plus another $100,132 for current expenses.

In one option, the county cut all longevity and 401K from employees, which would save the county about $440,430. In addition, county employees can also expect a five day furlough that will save the county $126,158, and taking away special appropriations that will subtract another $20,296. And even with these cuts, the county will still expect an additional $291,379, which would equate to $0.0089 tax increase.

A second option would call for the county to cut the both county school system’s current expense increase from seven to five percent, which would save the county another $184,144. Sampson Community College would also get the same five percent cut, which would save another $45,925. The plan also seeks cuts in longevity by half percent and 401K matches by one percent as well. This would leave a $142,794 deficit and a tax increase by $.0044 cents per $100 valuation.

The idea of a furlough seemed to disagree with some commissioners. And with it for employees entering the minds of commissioners, some recalled how some employees were incredibly unhappy with such a move.

“Nobody liked the furlough idea,” said commissioner John Blanton, who said that he has promised to never vote for a furlough again, but now he pointed out, “times have changed.”

Moorefield clarified that the main concern was the increase in school funding that the board approved earlier this year that may lead to a tax increase or a loss of a department.

Thus, he asked for the board’s permission to go back and figuring in just a three percent increase in schools rather than the seven percent that is anticipated. The board agreed, but Moorefield continued to say that the closing down a department should be considered.

“At some point, you are going to have to talk about closing down a department,” Moorefield pointed out. However, he did not name any departments he was referring to.

With this, Moorefield finished by saying that he would continue to “fine tune” the budget and possibly have a proposed budget ready by next month.

Katie Holland can be reached at 910-592-8137, ext. 136, or by e-mail at silife@myclintonnc.com.

Comments
(15)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
keepitright
|
May 21, 2009
Speaking of budget, what happened to the article and comments attached with it about the Sheriff and his handling of siezure funds? Is the editor afraid to tip the "political arena" over by allowing it to remain open on the website? Hmmmmm??????? Why is it there is no trace of it? I was enjoying the open debate in the comments. But i guess the Sheriff wanted it gone and Ms. Matthews complied!
tleecamp1
|
May 20, 2009
Not from NC, but in PA we have a per capita tax that is charged by the county. Each person whether they live in a house they own or rent, if they are over 18 they pay I believe $10 per person a year. Landlords are required to inform the county of who is living at rentals.

Or, have a one time tax assessed to anyone who receives a paycheck in Sampson County for a set amount. Again in PA it is $52 a year, but each county gets to choose the amount from $10 to $52. So, if people are coming into Sampson to work they will be charged the tax. We call it occupational tax.

I like the temporary restaurant tax idea. I also understand that it is not fair to land owners to pay for the majority of the budget downfall.

It is good that the county is looking into possible budget cuts, but before cutting a whole departments or benefits that make teaching marketable to professionals, a small rise in taxes or the creation of a temporary tax should be looked into.

surferdude69
|
May 16, 2009
Dump the county manager, hire Mike Aldridge.
mrscumbco
|
May 13, 2009
Silies........... I think its just great that you are such a "BOREFIELD" cheerleader! You should apply for a job helping him lift up his lips so he doesn't step on them!!!!!.....or keeping his bottles filled!!!!
MsSampco
|
May 13, 2009
http://clintonnc.com/pages/full_story?page_label=news_opinion_editorial&article-Our perspective =&id=2518412-Our perspective&widget=push&instance=secondary_stories_left_column&open=&#cb_post_comment_2518412
JAFS
|
May 12, 2009
I agree Mustange. Could we implement a tax hike that will require everyone to chip in and not just the land owners or county/state employees?
Mustange
|
May 12, 2009
Why not go ahead and have a 2 year restaurant tax say 5 or 6 percent to off set the countys tax woes. Or what ever percent thats reasonable BUT make sure its temporary. I would not mind paying a little extra each time i go out to eat as long as i know its temporary and its helping the county with its budget woes. Leave our teachers and county employees alone they are hurting enough.
1american
|
May 12, 2009
silies.. maybe you can enlighten us on what The SI has lied about?? Seems Mr. Moorefield won't say anything. As far as the budget goes, I hope no County employee looses his or her job! I do not think furlough is fair either. Furlough is basically using the 600 or 700 county employees to balance the budget and not using the 60,000 plus citizens of Sampson to balance it, is that fair???. Mr. Blanton stated that he would never vote for furlough again, well lets see if Mr. Blanton is a man of his word or just another politician that will say whatever to get elected. My dad always told me that you are only as good as your word is, well we'll see if Mr. Blanton is as good as his word or not!
silies
|
May 12, 2009
The Sampson Independent reported that Mr. Moorefield makes $12,000 as county attorney, not $100,000. It would be almost impossible to find another attorney to work for such a low salary, and certainly not one with his education and experience. And whatever his salary, it's certainly not enough for putting up with the continuous lies printed in this newspaper. He obviously cares about this county a great deal.
scmom
|
May 12, 2009
Actually, would should relieve Mr. Moorefield from anything to do with Sampson County. He is only there for a check and unfortunately for the residents of Sampson County, Mr. Moorefield does not seem to care about them or Sampson County.
mrscumbco
|
May 12, 2009
Relieve Mr. Moorefield of his job as County Attorney, at a salary of over $100,000 and apply that to the shortfall.
robins3226
|
May 12, 2009
Right on scmom!
scmom
|
May 12, 2009
Moorefield continues to display an attitude of not caring about the residents of Sampson County and their wants or needs. Is he willing to take a furlough and a pay cut? Bet not!

The current Sampson County Commissioners with the exception of Strickland who did not vote for hiring him, need to start listening to the people that they supposedly represent. They are beginning to seem as arrogant at Moorefield.
ytrewq
|
May 12, 2009
weaselkeeper
|
May 12, 2009
Gee, I don't know, why don't we start be by getting rid of Moorefield. With his arrogance and his lack of cooperation, his dismissal should send a message to the commissioners about who works for who in Sampson County. Sorry, guys, but despite what you may think, YOU work for us not the other way around. What do you think, John Blanton? Are you going to man up and do what needs to be done here or are you going to continue to lack a backbone??? The elimination of Moorefield's salary would make a substantial dent in balancing the budget.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: