Fatcow Icon
Tucking it in
by Doug Clark
2 years ago | 1078 views | 33 33 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Sampson County Schools students returning to classrooms in just over a week will have a new set of dress code rules to contend with, including one that requires them to tuck in their shirts.

“Everything is basically the same,” said Susan Warren, student services coordinator for Sampson County Schools, “except that this year, the students will have to tuck their shirt tails in. If the clothing is made with a belt loop, a belt must be worn as well (in grades 6-12 only). In elementary schools, the discretion is left to the principals.”

After months of talk about initiating a “standardized” dress code by county Board of Education members, as well as visits to all schools in the system to get feedback from parents, the board ultimately decided to stick with the lighter version of the code for the 2009-10 school year.

“The main thing we found from those meetings is that the parents, as well as the principals and teachers, wanted us to enforce the policy more,” superintendent Dr. Ethan Lenker said at a committee meeting earlier this year.

That, Lenker said, is what they’re working to do.

Warren said the decision to have children tuck in their shirts was “well thought out” by the board and administrators. “The principals and teachers were in on the discussions,” she said. “And it was a thought-out plan with everyone in agreement ... Clinton City Schools has had this rule in place for a few years now and so far, it hasn’t been a problem.”

The “three-inch above the knee” rule will remain in effect this year, despite some questions by board member Telfair Simpson at a meeting last September.

Simpson said he has heard some concerns from middle school parents who are having a difficult time finding clothes to fit their growing children.

“They are not opposed to the rule, necessarily,” said Simpson, “but at middle school, with the growth spurts that some young ladies have, some of them have longer legs than others, the three-inch rule kind of impacts them more than others ...”

It is a concern that is still on some parents’ minds with just over a week left until school opens.

“My child is not as slim as other children,” said one parent of a middle schooler, who did not wish to be identified. “She is not going to be able to ‘tuck’ in all of her clothes because she will be made fun of. I can agree with the ‘no baggy pants’ rule and the others, I understand that and certainly agree for safety issues. But to have all shirts tucked in and all students? I just think that is a little extreme.”

However, during the informational meetings last year, most parents were in favor of adopting a stricter dress code.

When Lenker visited the Midway District, an audience member made the argument that a stricter or standardized dress code would take away a child’s individuality. Lenker, without missing a beat, answered, “If clothes are defining a child, they need to be a little deeper.” Much of the audience burst into applause after Lenker’s comment.

Either way, the new rules are in place and system officials will be watching closely to see how it works throughout the school year.

“I really don’t think there will be any problems,” said Union District parent Hope Johnson. “I think that getting a strict code in the system will help. I hope that next year the board will consider that standardized dress code. It will put more focus back on the books and not on the fashion.”

For full dress code information click on to www.sampson.k12.nc.us.

To reach Doug Clark call 910-592-8137 ext. 123 or send e-mail to sisports@myclintonnc.com.

Comments
(33)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
rick0557
|
October 11, 2009
I have read all of the postings on here. Some are attempting to be clowns and succeeding at it. There is a practical side of a dress code in a setting. Fashion statements should not be tolerated in a educational enviroment. Shirt Tails were attached to a Shirt for a purpose and should be acted upon. Leaving your shirt tail out over your pockets and belt can be a oppertunity to hide contraband not allowed on school grounds in the first place. Weither it be innocent in nature or not, it doesn't need a place of concealment. These are Children and they should be dressed to be warm and dry. Not like Adults in TV videos or shows. I noticed one posting by a Teacher who says that the Administration is not enforcing the standards. Warn One time and then if compliance is not met, then gather the other teachers of that student and go forward to the Administration. Administration should take action then. Sampson County Schools dress codes should reflect should be going on in the system. If you want your child to dress like a thug, don't be surprized if they are treated like a thug by thier peers. In the past, educators were more worried about students showing up for school with clean clothing than the current street fashions.
anonymous
|
September 12, 2009
I don't care how much you whine about it~~~~~~~~ ALL SCHOOLS in Sampson County should adopt a school uniform policy. That will solve everyone's problem. A few mothers are going to be disturbed anyway when their little hoochies can no longer dress like pole dancers at school. I think the kids would be fine with school uniforms if the parents would just stay out of it.

Signed: dukeblue
briefcasejoe
|
September 11, 2009
Everybody should be required to dress in ankle length, XXL moo moo's! That way, no crack is exposed and you don't know who is fat and who isn't. i have never been so tired of being forced to look at crack in my life. The hip length jeans should be outlawed along with the baggy pants where underwear are exposed.

Regardless of what you say, I vote for the way greengreen dresses! I call that holding yourself in high esteem!!!! I would never think anyone who dresses like that is a girlie man. I'll tip my hat to you greengreen!!!!!
Lafe's Strumpet
|
August 20, 2009
Stanford and Lafus, you two missed your calling. This paper really should hire you two to collaborate on a weekly column and spice things up providing a controversial, realistic, politically incorrect view of life in Sampson County. It would be better than that clown in the center ring that you were told not to look at but just couldn't suppress the curiosity and find enough will power not to peep. Can you imagine the comments you two could generate! I would never stop laughing.
stanford
|
August 19, 2009
JAFS, as you mentioned in another article comment, here is the jingle:

"Tuck it in, tuck it in, if you do you will win. No more sin, no more sin....just tuck it in, tuck it in. Teachers keep an open eye. Do not let one get by. School food will make you fat. Wide white belts will hide that. Greegreene will take down your name. He will make you a shame. Fashion police is his call. Cleaning up the school for one and all. Except teachers!!!!!!" That tune is song, as recommended by JAFS to the Glade plug it in jingle tune.
lafus_crickamus
|
August 19, 2009
I guess the posters were following the shiny object again and got off track.
anonymous
|
August 18, 2009
Ms. Greegreene, take off the white belt and get real. We do not expect you to understand that people can dress casually when not on duty, and as they wish. What is wrong with you?
greegreene
|
August 18, 2009
If the Chief of Police dresses like that then that is a disgrace to the office he holds. But if the shoe fits wear it.
Python
|
August 18, 2009
Greegreene, sounds like your dislike of the way some people dress is a direct reflection of the Clinton Chief of Police--cap, baggy shorts and shirt tail hanging out???
Python
|
August 18, 2009
WOW, my next pair of dress shoes will have steel toes for safty
JAFS
|
August 18, 2009
Hater....
lafus_crickamus
|
August 18, 2009
Suck up....
JAFS
|
August 18, 2009
I am impressed as well Greene. I'm guessing your many years of military training have stayed with you. Too bad more people don't care what they look and dress like. I'm going GREENE!
greegreene
|
August 18, 2009
You're close anonymous BUT, the belt color is brown, NO sidewalls 1-1/2inch sideburns the colone is Brute I would say I'm totally fit for a person my age and I nor my wife would say I'm girlish, I do wear black socks but no wing tips only point left is the jeans I do not even own a pair of blue jeans I wear slacks or dress pants and they do normally have a crease. And MR stanford I do look in the mirror and I am impressed and thank you.
stanford
|
August 18, 2009
MR. Greegreene we know who you are and have seen you dressed in public. Please go check the mirror...especially before going out in public like that again. Thanks
anonymous
|
August 18, 2009
Greegreene sounds like you have your act together. Sounds like a little girlish to me though. Some counter points on your comments:

I imagine you have creases in your freshly ironed jeans. Your body form is probably wobly and unfit. Neat cut hair with marine white sidewalls. A white belt probably bought when you were in Florida. Black socks with your black wing tips. Probably us the old Enlish leather cologne. Shirt tail tucked in...wow, I am impressed.
greegreene
|
August 18, 2009
MrDD, No I am not a woman, I am a man. No, my hair is not dyed. I DO NOT go out in public wiithout,

1. Clean Pressed clothes.

2. Clothes that fit my body statue.

3. Neat cut hair that is combed.

4. A belt on.

5. Shoes and socks on. (no flip-flops)

6. I bathe several times a day.

7. Shirt-tail tucked (no t-shirt worn as main shirt)

And I HAVE put my life on the line many times for this nation. I'm sorry I stomped your toes.
lafus_crickamus
|
August 18, 2009
greegreene,

You are dead on about these hogs trying to squeeze into clothes they know are way too small for them. I just think dd is a card carrying member of Chubby Chasers of American and you greatly offended him.
JAFS
|
August 17, 2009
Isn't it sad we even have to address this issue? No I don't support requiring shirt tails be tucked in, however I support girls having pants with room enough and shirts long enough to actually meet and potentially tuck in. I support guys having clothes that fit rather than them being large enough for the whole family to live in. You get sick of seeing cleavage and cracks. Girls dressed as though they came off the stripper pole and guys dressed as though they stepped out of an MTV rap video. Whatever happened to tasteful? Save us all the trouble and make students and teachers wear uniforms. It works at Tarheel Challenge!
butterbean821
|
August 17, 2009
Okay, these comments are making me laugh! I am a middle school teacher in good 'ol Sampson County (for the last 8 years). To the person who commented, "if the dress code had been enforced....," please know that at my school, the teachers were enforcing the policy, but it was not being followed through by administration. We were told to give each child a warning each day, even if we could see their butt hanging out of their pants EVERYDAY! So, a student could get 5 different warnings from 5 different teachers, and nothing went any further than that unless we decided to call the parents, which half the time doesn't help. That is why you may have "perceived" that the old dress code wasn't being enforced, when actually the teachers' hands are pretty much tied.

As far as the teachers' dress code, I must say I dress professionally as I take my job seriously and want to portray myself as a professional, not as a "student." Believe me, I have seen some VERY unprofessionally dressed teachers. I can see why some think teachers should have a dress code, but I do not think it should be the same as the student dress code. Just as it is hard for some students to understand, teachers are NOT on students' levels- teachers are adults.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: