Fatcow Icon
Fee for gaming machines a wise move by Council
21 months ago | 481 views | 2 2 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
If you can’t stop them, you might as well charge them.

That seems to be the mantra of Clinton’s City Council as they march head on into a new venture that could earn them nearly a million dollars next year.

In a unanimous vote last week, council members opted to level a $2,500 per video gaming machine privilege license fee that will impact about seven businesses in the city limits. In total, some 89 machines have been identified in those businesses, and all 89 would be subject to the newly approved licensing fee.

The fee comes on the heels of a council-initiated survey to review what other municipalities are doing regarding video gaming machines.

The city cannot ban the machines because state law prohibits members from doing so; however there are no stipulations that prevent city officials from taking steps to level fees.

And that is exactly what members did last Wednesday night, May 5, opting to raise their initial $500 fee suggestion to the far stiffer $2,500 per machine.

In theory, council members believe they should recoup some of the money they must spend in monitoring the gaming activity and keeping an eye on the businesses that have them on their premises.

It’s a wise idea and one that will either bring the city some additional revenue or, in the case of those who don’t want to pay such a stiff fee, rid the town of some of the machines that currently exist.

It only makes sense to charge a license fee for the operations which, up until now, have been regulated but haven’t been charged.

The fee increase was a suggestion by Councilman Steve Stefanovich, who noted in his motion that he believed a $500 fee was simply too low, particularly given that so many other like-sized municipalities were levying much higher fees.

He was right. If there’s no way to eliminate the machines, then the city should reap some of the benefits from their operation.

We applaud City Council for approving the higher and likely far more controversial fees rather than simply accepting $500 and moving on.

In reality, gaming machine operators may find this a significant blow to their wallets, but even they know that the fee is a reasonable price to pay for machines that have been known to produce far more revenue than that in a couple hours time.

Video gaming machines are a popular, border-line illegal, game of chance that attracts many people across this country. The state has decided it’s OK to keep them around, so we see no reason at all why the city shouldn’t recoup some of its money for regulating them.

It was a wise move and one citizens should applaud.
Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
lafus_crickamus2
|
May 13, 2010
"Video gaming machines are a popular, border-line illegal, game of chance"

Sherry, what's border-line illegal? Is that the same as border-line pregnant?

"Video gaming machines are a popular, border-line illegal, game of chance"

Sherry, what is a game of chance? Isn't the NC Sate Lottery for education a game of chance?

Sherry, I think you and the Clinton City Council need to get off your high horses.

SIStrumpet
|
May 13, 2010
Well here we go again with Saint Sherry's words of wisdom. The Bible Thumpers have kept liquor by the drink out of Sampson County until the 21st century while secretly getting drunk every Saturday night only sobering up long enough to catch the 11 am service and now they have failed with keeping "BORDER-LINE illegal" gambling out of Clinton. OMG What is the world coming to? I wonder how many of the City Council members have ever, bought a lottery ticket, been to Las Vegas or Atlantic City and participated in BORDER-LINE illegal activities while visiting there? Sherry, you're trying to make a gray area where there is none. An activity is either LEGAL or ILLEGAL. I'm pretty sure no one has ever been arrested for border-line illegal activities. If someone wants to have a video gaming business then they should be allowed to do just that, if people want to play the games then they should be able to as well.....after all, it is LEGAL. No one, especially you with your condescending editorals have the right to judge them for doing something that is perfectly legal! As for the coucil, why don't they own up to their decision as being what it is. It't not about morality but merely a cash cow for the city. If the business makes money, the city makes money. Seems simple enough to me. So I guess I would have to ask you Sherry, are the actions you have taken to limit our free speech on the SI illegal or just border-line illegal?
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: